IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i6p1373-1397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Online Business-to-Business Markets for Industrial Product Reuse: Evidence from an Operational Policy Change

Author

Listed:
  • Suvrat Dhanorkar

    (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Karen Donohue

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Kevin Linderman

    (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

Abstract

Problem definition : We examine the importance of expert services in online materials and waste exchanges (OMWEs), which are online business-to-business markets for coordinating transactions of industrial surplus, by-products, and waste. Academic/practical relevance : OMWEs face unique challenges because of their product mix and market characteristics. Many OMWEs have traditionally relied on a combination of routine services (online aggregation, filtered search, etc.) and expert services (selective and spatial matching, contract facilitation, etc.). Although OMWEs employ varying levels of expert services, the ultimate value of expert services in promoting transactions is not fully understood. From a managerial perspective, our study provides insights into the importance of balancing routine and expert services, offering guidance on when expert services offer the most benefits. From an academic perspective, we expand on the type of product and market attributes that should be considered in tailoring OMWE designs. Methodology : We use transactional data from a unique OMWE setting (MNExchange.org), which consists of approximately 3,500 product listings from 700+ supplier firms, collected during 2001–2007. We use various econometric techniques (survival analysis, regression discontinuity, etc.) to examine the changes in performance, including transaction rates and time to market, attributable to an operational policy change that occurred in 2004. We further conduct a detailed examination of mechanisms, alternative explanations, and counterfactual analysis. Results : The results show that eliminating expert services in OMWEs can adversely affect transaction outcomes in OMWEs. In particular, the results show that OMWEs should consider their product mix and market characteristics when making decisions about the appropriate use of expert services. Managerial implications : The study provides insights for improving the potential of online reuse marketplaces in the circular economy. From a broader perspective, the paper contributes to the debate on the role of technology in sustainable development and technology substitution for human tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Suvrat Dhanorkar & Karen Donohue & Kevin Linderman, 2021. "Online Business-to-Business Markets for Industrial Product Reuse: Evidence from an Operational Policy Change," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1373-1397, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1373-1397
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0898
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0898?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1373-1397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.