IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i5p1217-1236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory Sharing and Demand-Side Underweighting

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Zhao

    (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Liang Xu

    (College of Business, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588)

  • Enno Siemsen

    (Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

Abstract

Problem definition : Transshipment/inventory sharing has been used in practice because of its risk-pooling potential. However, human decision makers play a critical role in making inventory decisions in an inventory sharing system, which may affect its benefits. We investigate whether the opportunity to transship inventory influences decision makers’ inventory decisions and whether, as a result, the intended risk-pooling benefits materialize. Academic/practical relevance : Previous research in transshipment, which is focused on finding optimal stocking and sharing decisions, assumes rational decision making without any systematic bias. As one of the first to study inventory sharing from a behavioral perspective, we demonstrate a persistent stocking-decision bias relevant for inventory sharing systems. Methodology : We develop a behavioral model of a multilocation inventory system with transshipments. Using four behavioral studies, we identify, test, estimate, and mitigate a demand-side underweighting bias: although inventory sharing brings both a supply-side benefit and a demand-side benefit, players underestimate the latter. We show analytically that such bias leads to underordering. We also explore whether reframing the inventory sharing decision reduces this bias. Results : Our results show that subjects persistently reduce their order quantities when transshipments are allowed. This underordering, which persists even when a decision-support system suggests optimal quantities, causes insufficient inventory in the system, in turn reducing the risk-pooling benefits of inventory sharing. Underordering is evidently caused by an underweighting bias; although players correctly estimate the supply-side potential from transshipment, they only estimate 20% of the demand-side potential. Managerial implications : Although inventory sharing can profitably reduce inventory, too much underordering undermines its intended risk-pooling benefits. The demand-side benefits of transshipment need to be emphasized when implementing inventory sharing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Zhao & Liang Xu & Enno Siemsen, 2021. "Inventory Sharing and Demand-Side Underweighting," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1217-1236, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:5:p:1217-1236
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:5:p:1217-1236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.