IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i4p835-853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Immediate Feedback Make You Not Try as Hard? A Study on Automotive Telematics

Author

Listed:
  • Vivek Choudhary

    (Information Technology and Operations Management, Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798)

  • Masha Shunko

    (Information Systems and Operations Management, Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Serguei Netessine

    (Operations, Information and Decisions, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104)

Abstract

Problem definition : Mobile and internet-of-things (IoT) devices increasingly enable tracking of user behavior, and they often provide real-time or immediate feedback to consumers in an effort to improve their conduct. Growing adoption of such technologies leads to an important question: “Does reviewing immediate feedback improve user behavior?” We study immediate (close to real-time) feedback in the context of automotive telematics, which has been recognized as the most disruptive technology in the automotive insurance industry. Academic/practical relevance : Numerous automotive telematics providers claim unsubstantiated benefits from immediate feedback, while we still barely understand the implications of such feedback on user behavior. Given the high adoption of these technologies in automotive applications, it is important to study the effect of such feedback on behavior. This understanding is important, given that other attempts to make driving safer have led to unintended consequences in the past. Methodology : Using proprietary data on driving behavior, as measured by several parameters, such as harsh braking, speeding, and steep acceleration, we investigate the impact of the driver’s decision to review immediate feedback on driving behavior. We use instrumental variable regression to estimate the effect. Results : Contrary to the claims from multiple telematics providers, we find that, on average, users’ driving performance after they review detailed feedback is nearly 14.9% worse than that of users who do not review their detailed feedback. This impairment in performance translates to 6.9%, or a one-year reduction in interaccident time. Strong negative feedback (e.g., a sharp deterioration in performance) exerts a positive effect on short-term performance, but this only happens for very large drops in performance (3% of cases). Furthermore, we demonstrate that drivers just below the insurance-incentive thresholds exert greater effort following immediate feedback. Managerial implications : Our results provide a key message to firms employing immediate feedback—specifically, that such technology can yield unintended consequences. Furthermore, we show that drivers should receive only strong negative (but not positive) feedback to improve their performance. Finally, our results suggest that insurance incentives should be continuous rather than a step function.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivek Choudhary & Masha Shunko & Serguei Netessine, 2021. "Does Immediate Feedback Make You Not Try as Hard? A Study on Automotive Telematics," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 835-853, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:835-853
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:835-853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.