IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i4p781-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan W. Buell

    (Technology and Operations Management, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Ethan Porter

    (Political Science Department, School of Media and Public Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia 20052)

  • Michael I. Norton

    (Marketing Department, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163)

Abstract

Problem definition : As trust in government reaches historic lows, frustration with government performance approaches record highs. Academic/practical relevance : We propose that in coproductive settings such as government services, people’s trust and engagement levels can be enhanced by designing service interactions to allow them to see the often-hidden work—via increasing operational transparency—being performed in response to their engagement. Methodology and results : Three studies, conducted in the field and laboratory, show that surfacing the submerged state through operational transparency impacts citizens’ attitudes and behavior. Study 1 leveraged proprietary data from a mobile phone application developed by the City of Boston, Massachusetts, through which residents submit service requests; the city’s goal was to increase engagement with the app. Users who received photographs of government addressing their service requests submitted 60% more requests and in 38% more categories over the ensuing 13 months than users who did not receive photographs. These significant increases in engagement persisted for 11 months following users’ initial exposure to operational transparency and were highest for users who had experienced government to be at least moderately responsive to their requests in the past. In study 2, residents of Boston who interacted with a website that visualized both service requests (e.g., potholes and broken street lamps) and efforts by the city’s government to address those requests became 14% more trusting and 12% more supportive of government. Moreover, residents who received additional transparency into the growing backlog of service requests that government was failing to fulfill, revealing government to be less responsive, were no more nor less trusting and supportive of government than residents who received no transparency. Study 3 replicated findings from the first two studies and documented underlying mechanisms: operational transparency increases trust and engagement by two causal pathways—through consumers’ increased perceptions of effort by the government and through increased perceptions that engaging with it is impactful. Responsiveness increases feelings of personal efficacy, which boosts willingness to engage both directly and indirectly through the other causal paths. Managerial implications : Taken together, our results suggest that showing more work performed by government—via operational transparency—encourages people to do more work themselves. These results have implications for the design of a broad array of coproductive services where operations are hidden and consumer trust and engagement are critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan W. Buell & Ethan Porter & Michael I. Norton, 2021. "Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 781-802, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:781-802
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0877
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:781-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.