IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v32y1986i10p1301-1315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Charles H. Fine

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

Recent interest in product quality suggests that effort devoted to improving the quality of manufactured products may reduce unit costs. This conjecture---that improving quality can lower costs---challenges the traditional assumption that unit costs increase with increased quality assurance activities and has significant implications for quality management. By introducing the idea of a quality-based learning curve, this paper links the previously disjoint literatures of quality control and learning curves to explain why high quality and low costs need not be inconsistent. When costs are affected by a quality-based learning curve, product quality favorably influences the rate of cost reduction due to learning. Thus, costs decline more rapidly with the experience of producing higher quality products. Two formulations of the quality-based learning phenomenon are presented. The first assumes that quality-based experience affects direct manufacturing costs. For this formulation, the optimal quality level is decreasing over time, but is always larger than the optimal base-case quality level. The optimal production quantity is constant if the interest rate is zero and increasing in time when the interest rate is positive. The second formulation assumes that quality-based experience affects quality control costs. In this case, the optimal quality level is always increasing over time. The optimal quantity behavior is qualitatively similar to the first formulation. A key feature of the second quality-based model is that it resolves the controversy between the economic conformance level model of Juran, which asserts that one should use cost-tradeoff analysis to find the optimal quality level, and the claims of Deming and Crosby, that zero defects is always the optimal quality level. For certain parameter values, the optimal quality policy in the second model conforms to the economic conformance level model but the dynamics of the model demonstrates the optimality of always pushing towards zero defects.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles H. Fine, 1986. "Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1301-1315, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:10:p:1301-1315
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:32:y:1986:i:10:p:1301-1315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.