The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations
AbstractThis paper describes the nature and design of post-industrial organizations. It begins with an assessment of the popular literature on post-industrial society, and finds that this literature is an inappropriate basis for inferring the nature of post-industrial organizations. Partly as a consequence of this finding, the paper turns to systems theory as a basis for determining both the nature of post-industrial society and the nature of the increased demands that this environment would impose on post-industrial organizations. The middle three sections of the paper describe design features that post-industrial organizations will employ to deal with these demands. In particular they examine designs for making more effective three processes that will exhibit increased importance in post-industrial organizations: (1) decision-making, (2) innovation, and (3) information acquisition and distribution. In addition to its conclusions concerning the design features that post-industrial organizations will possess, the paper sets forth three general conclusions. One of these is that, even though the aggregate of the demands on post-industrial organizations will be qualitatively greater than that experienced by previous organizations, there are design features that organizations can adopt that will enable them to cope with even worst-case loadings of these demands. A second conclusion is that the nature of the post-industrial environment will cause decision-making, innovation, and information acquisition and distribution to take on added importance in post-industrial organizations, and that one result of this will be that organizations will attempt to ensure routine effectiveness of these processes through increased formalization. In some cases this formalization will have as its purpose ensuring the existence of informal (or at least unstructured) activities, such as experimentation by "self-designing" organizations or acquisition of "soft" information by top managers. The third conclusion set forth is that during the current transition period between the industrial and post-industrial societies we can expect many organizations to fail, or to flee to less than wholly desirable niches, because they are ignorant of the post-industrial technologies, structures, and processes that would enable them to successfully engage the post-industrial environment and to become viable post-industrial organizations. It appears that an important task of organizational and management scientists during this period will be to aid in the development, transfer, and implementation of post-industrial design features and in this way help reduce the possibility of unnecessary failure or flight.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.
Volume (Year): 30 (1984)
Issue (Month): 8 (August)
decision making; innovation; organization design; future; post-industrial;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Ariss, Sonny S. & Zhang, Qingyu, 2002. "The impact of flexible process capability on the product-process matrix: an empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 135-145, March.
- Orlikowski, Wanda J. (Wanda Janina). & Gash, Debra Carol, 1959-., 1992. "Changing frames : understanding technological change in organizations," Working papers 3368-92., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
- Luis Eduardo Solis Galvan, 2002. "The Post-Industrial Paradigm: An Imperative," Working Papers Economia wp02-06, Instituto de Empresa, Area of Economic Environment.
- repec:cmj:journl:y:2013:i:29:piturlea is not listed on IDEAS
- Bergeron, François & Raymond, Louis & Rivard, Suzanne, 2001. "Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-142, April.
- Rockart, John F. (John Fralick) & DeLong, David W. & Management in the 1990s (Program), 2003. "Executive support systems and the nature of executive work," Working papers no. 135, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
- Rondeau, Patrick J. & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. & Vonderembse, Mark A., 2003. "The information systems environment of time-based competitors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 253-268, August.
- Marius PIŢURLEA & Alina Georgiana IANCU & Dorin IANCU, 2013. "Romanian organizations to the new challenges of the knowledge society," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 2, pages 197-212, October.
- Ramaprasad, A. & Rai, A., 1996. "Envisioning management of information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 179-193, April.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.