Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Economic Models for R and D Project Selection in the Presence of Project Interactions

Contents:

Author Info

  • G. Edward Fox

    (School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Norman R. Baker

    (College of Business Administration, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221)

  • John L. Bryant

    (College of Business Administration, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    One reason existing approaches for dealing with benefit interactions in economic R and D project selection models are difficult to apply is that it is difficult to assess the interactions directly. This difficulty can be traced at least in part to the lack of a modeling framework within which different types of interaction can be identified and related to project and portfolio benefit. In this paper, a modeling framework is proposed within which certain kinds of benefit interactions, called present value (PV) interactions, are assessed indirectly by explicitly modeling R and D project impacts on profitability. Within the proposed framework, the role of traditionally recognized types of interaction in the calculation of present value is clarified, and it is shown that PV interaction exists even when traditionally recognized types of interaction are assumed to be absent. The proposed framework offers one method for assessing PV interactions. An example illustrates the framework and shows that ignoring PV interactions can result in both nonoptimal project selections and resource allocations, even when traditionally recognized types of interactions are absent. The framework and resulting model should be useful in enhancing decision making in firms using PV-based approaches to project selection, whether or not they are interested in using a model that accounts for PV interactions. This is expected since the overall framework provides a basis for analyzing the probable consequences of assuming that no PV interaction is present and for communicating these probable consequences to management

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.7.890
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.

    Volume (Year): 30 (1984)
    Issue (Month): 7 (July)
    Pages: 890-902

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:7:p:890-902

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 300, Hanover, MD 21076 USA
    Phone: +1-443-757-3500
    Fax: 443-757-3515
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.informs.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: R&D management; project selection;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Medaglia, Andres L. & Graves, Samuel B. & Ringuest, Jeffrey L., 2007. "A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 869-894, June.
    2. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    3. Kyparisis, George J. & Gupta, Sushil K. & Ip, Chi-Ming, 1996. "Project selection with discounted returns and multiple constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 87-96, October.
    4. Santhanam, Radhika & Kyparisis, George J., 1996. "A decision model for interdependent information system project selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 380-399, March.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:7:p:890-902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.