Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Relational Systems of Preference with One or More Pseudo-Criteria: Some New Concepts and Results

Contents:

Author Info

  • B. Roy

    (LAMSADE, Universite de Paris Dauphine, Place du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France)

  • Ph. Vincke

    (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, CP210, Boulevard du Triomphe, B1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper proposes new concepts and new results which could lead to a more realistic preference modeling than in classical decision theory. Sections 1--3 present four fundamental situations of preferences, their combinations and the concept of relational system of preferences. In §4, a particular case of relational system of preference is studied. It is associated with the concept of pseudo-criterion derived from the classical concept of criterion by adjunction of two thresholds. Some results are given, generalizing the properties of such well-known structures as complete preorders and semiorders. Sections 5 and 6 emphasize the possibilities given by the preceding concepts to take the imprecisions, irresolutions and incomparabilities appearing in every concrete problem where several criteria must be considered into account.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1323
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.

    Volume (Year): 30 (1984)
    Issue (Month): 11 (November)
    Pages: 1323-1335

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:11:p:1323-1335

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 7240 Parkway Drive, Suite 300, Hanover, MD 21076 USA
    Phone: +1-443-757-3500
    Fax: 443-757-3515
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.informs.org/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: preference; decision; pseudo-criteria; semiorder;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Hokkanen, Joonas & Salminen, Pekka, 1997. "Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 19-36, April.
    2. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 1999. "Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 373-378, December.
    3. Kalaı¨, Rim & Lamboray, Claude & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2012. "Lexicographic α-robustness: An alternative to min–max criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 722-728.
    4. Gal, Tomas & Hanne, Thomas, 2006. "Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 584-592, January.
    5. Santha Chenayah & Eiji Takeda, 2005. "Eigenvector Procedure based on Weighted Preference Flows in Multicriteria Outranking Analysis," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 05-22, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP).
    6. Mousseau, Vincent & Figueira, Jose & Dias, Luis & Gomes da Silva, Carlos & Climaco, Joao, 2003. "Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 72-93, May.
    7. Dias, Luis & Mousseau, Vincent & Figueira, Jose & Climaco, Joao, 2002. "An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 332-348, April.
    8. Roy, B. & Figueira, J.R. & Almeida-Dias, J., 2014. "Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 9-20.
    9. Vetschera, Rudolf, 1991. "A preference-preserving projection technique for MCDM," Discussion Papers, Series 1 256, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    10. Bentes, Alexandre Veronese & Carneiro, Jorge & da Silva, Jorge Ferreira & Kimura, Herbert, 2012. "Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1790-1799.
    11. Leger, Julien & Martel, Jean-Marc, 2002. "A multicriteria assignment procedure for a nominal sorting problematic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 349-364, April.
    12. Philippe Vincke, 1994. "Recent progresses in Multicriteria Decision-Aid," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 21-32, September.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:30:y:1984:i:11:p:1323-1335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.