IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v28y1982i8p910-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method for the Prescriptive Assessment of the Flow of Information Within Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Delehanty

    (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)

  • Pasquale Sullo

    (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)

  • William A. Wallace

    (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)

Abstract

Research on information flow in organizational networks has focused on structural aspects and the identification and location of special communicators or "gatekeepers." In this paper, the methods of system reliability are adapted to the systematic analysis of information flow networks; in this context, system reliability is the probability of information flow between the information source and the ultimate recipient, while arc reliability is the probability of information flow on that arc. Gatekeepers generally differ from other nodes in the network by virtue of their greater number of and more reliable incoming and outgoing arcs. Through methods illustrated here, gatekeepers, as well as other nodes and their connecting arcs, can be assessed with respect to their contribution to system effectiveness (reliability). With this analytical capability, the manager can explore and assess alternate courses of action in order to adopt those which most enhance system effectiveness. The approach is illustrated by application to two representative studies from the literature on information flow in R&D organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Delehanty & Pasquale Sullo & William A. Wallace, 1982. "A Method for the Prescriptive Assessment of the Flow of Information Within Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(8), pages 910-924, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:28:y:1982:i:8:p:910-924
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.28.8.910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.8.910
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.28.8.910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:28:y:1982:i:8:p:910-924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.