IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v22y1975i3p384-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternate Approach to Indicator Development

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Flax

    (The Urban Institute, Washington, D. C.)

Abstract

In the previous paper Professor Malizia develops two tests ("correspondedness" and "correctness") and uses them for comparing two sets of indicators. He seeks an "evaluation methodology which is `objective' in that it does not depend upon the attitudes of managers or public officials." Here, a different approach to the problem of evaluating or designing indicators is suggested. Rather than attempting to design multi-purpose indicators, one might deliberately seek to match indicator specifications systematically to the requirements of different managers and public officials. The crucial technical refinements of data definition and measurement precision can then be undertaken in the context of a knowledge of the eventual usage of the indicators being developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Flax, 1975. "An Alternate Approach to Indicator Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 384-385, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:22:y:1975:i:3:p:384-385
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.22.3.384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.3.384
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.22.3.384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:22:y:1975:i:3:p:384-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.