Simplifying the Choice between Uncertain Prospects Where Preference is Nonlinear
AbstractThis work makes analytical progress in reducing or avoiding two practical difficulties in using preference or utility theory in the analysis of decisions involving uncertainty: (1) assessing the preference curve, and (2) doing calculations with the resultant curve, which may not have an analytically-convenient functional form. The paper identifies circumstances under which simplifications can be found which overcome these difficulties, while at the same time properly reflecting attitude towards risk in the analysis. It is assumed that a decision-maker must choose between risks w\~ 1 and w\~ 2. He wishes to make decisions consistent with a preference curve u(\cdot) which exists, but has not necessarily been assessed, so he can choose i to maximize expected preference, Eu(w\~ i). Most results require that the cumulative probability distribution of w\~ 1 and w\~ 2 cross at most once. The results are widely but not universally applicable. Situations are identified where an easy-to-assess, easy-to-analyze preference curve will serve as a proxy for the decision-maker's own preference curve. These situations permit use of any preferences curve from a class having a specified relationship with the decision-maker's curve. For example, in some instances a negative exponential (constant risk aversion) preference function can be used in place of the decision-maker's curve, and in others an expected value analysis will suffice.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.
Volume (Year): 20 (1974)
Issue (Month): 7 (March)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Wong, Wing-Keung, 2007.
"Stochastic dominance and mean-variance measures of profit and loss for business planning and investment,"
European Journal of Operational Research,
Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 829-843, October.
- Wing-Keung Wong, 2007. "Stochastic Dominance and Mean-Variance Measures of Profit and Loss for Business Planning and Investment," SCAPE Policy Research Working Paper Series 0705, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, SCAPE.
- Wing-Keung Wong, 2007. "Stochastic Dominance and Mean-Variance Measures of Profit and Loss for Business Planning and Investment," Finance Working Papers 21922, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
- Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Risk Efficiency in the Interpretation of Agricultural Production Research," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(03), September.
- Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2011.
"Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures based on Mean-Variance and Stochastic Dominance,"
KIER Working Papers
755, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
- Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2010. "Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures Based on Mean-Variance and Stochastic Dominance," Working Papers in Economics 10/22, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
- Lean, H.H. & McAleer, M.J. & Wong, W-K., 2010. "Investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance and stochastic dominance," Econometric Institute Report EI 2010-37, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute.
- Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2010. "Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures Based on Mean-Variance and Stochastic Dominance," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-744, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
- Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2010. "Investor Preferences for Oil Spot and Futures Based on Mean-Variance and Stochastic Dominance," CARF F-Series CARF-F-220, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
- Wing-Keung Wong & Raymond H. Chan, 2005.
"Prospect and Markowitz Stochastic Dominance,"
Monash Economics Working Papers
08/05, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Elamin H. Elbasha, 2005. "Risk aversion and uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: the expected-utility, moment-generating function approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 457-470.
- Antonella Basso & Paolo Pianca, 1997. "On the relative efficiency of nth order and DARA stochastic dominance rules," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 207-222.
- Ronny Aboudi & Dominique Thon, 1993. "Expected utility and the siegel paradox: A generalization," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 69-93, February.
- Bruce A. McCarl & David A. Bessler, 1989.
"Estimating An Upper Bound On The Pratt Risk A Version Coefficient When The Utility Function Is Unknown,"
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,
Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 56-63, 04.
- McCarl, Bruce A. & Bessler, David A., 1989. "Estimating An Upper Bound On The Pratt Risk A Version Coefficient When The Utility Function Is Unknown," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(01), April.
- Drynan, Ross G., 1987. "Sufficient Conditions for Dominance of Simply Related Prospects," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(01), April.
- Maynard, Leigh J. & Harper, Jayson K. & Hoffman, Lynn D., 1997. "Impact Of Risk Preferences On Crop Rotation Choice," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), April.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.