IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v10y1964i4p709-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Test of a Statistical Method for Computing Selected Inventory Model Characteristics by Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Murray A. Geisler

    (The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica)

Abstract

This article is a companion piece to M. A. Geisler, The Sizes of Simulation Samples Required to Compute Certain Inventory Characteristics with Stated Precision and Confidence, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, January, 1964. Special statistical methods were used in that article to compute the sample sizes for specified inventory models. In this article, the methods were tested by applying them to particular inventory cases, and determining how well the actual precision and confidence obtained in the estimates agreed with expectation. We found that the actual precision and confidence obtained for each of the inventory policies and procurement lead-time cases tested did correspond closely with expectation. Thus, it was expected that 95 per cent of the samples of the zero procurement lead-time cases tried would have sample values within 100 per cent of the true mean value. In the shortage calculations, the results ranged from 94.3 to 97.6 per cent, and for the overages, the range was from 95.6 to 99.9 per cent. From this test, we concluded that the statistical procedure given in the prior article is valid, and produces reliable estimates of mean shortages and overages per period.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray A. Geisler, 1964. "A Test of a Statistical Method for Computing Selected Inventory Model Characteristics by Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 709-715, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:10:y:1964:i:4:p:709-715
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.10.4.709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.10.4.709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.10.4.709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:10:y:1964:i:4:p:709-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.