IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v3y1973i4p47-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Science---Questioning the Meaning of “Democratic” Management

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel N. Braunstein

    (School of Economics and Management, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48063)

Abstract

Just as in the 1930s and 40s, the world is still experimenting with many autocratic forms of administration. Currently, not all of these autocrats are human. Some of them involve a “one best” model of accounting, information systems, and decision-making. The need for behaviorists to demonstrate the existence of alternative forms is just as great now as it was when Levine and others began their work on the importance of group dynamics to formal organizations thirty years ago. Many managers still have the concept that information flows up the organization and decisions flow down. But an acknowledgment of the existence of alternative organizational systems does not have to be sugar-coated with the term democratic .

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel N. Braunstein, 1973. "Behavioral Science---Questioning the Meaning of “Democratic” Management," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 47-49, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:3:y:1973:i:4:p:47-49
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.3.4.47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.3.4.47
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.3.4.47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:3:y:1973:i:4:p:47-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.