IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v29y1999i6p127-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment: Using Product Profiling to Illustrate Manufacturing-Marketing Misalignment

Author

Listed:
  • Richard J. Schonberger

    (Schonberger & Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 66948, Seattle, Washington 98166 and Department of Management Science, School of Business, University of Washington, Box 353200, Seattle, Washington 98195-3200)

Abstract

In their July–August 1998 article, Hill, Menda, and Dilts described Rumack Pharmaceutical Company (disguised name) as an example of misalignment between marketing and manufacturing. The problem was that marketing had stretched the product line beyond manufacturing's capacity limits. The authors stated that operations managers took an action that “would seem unwise or contrary to accepted practice in many of today's manufacturing organizations. Rumack decided to increase production lot sizes by an average of 100 percent” [p. 61]. The authors were respectful (appropriately, in view of Rumack's open door to their research) of the deliberations that resulted in this decision. Many readers, though, will probably wonder, as I do, about the correctness of the decision, considering the widely held impression that lot sizes should fall, not rise.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard J. Schonberger, 1999. "Comment: Using Product Profiling to Illustrate Manufacturing-Marketing Misalignment," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 127-129, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:29:y:1999:i:6:p:127-129
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.29.6.127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.29.6.127
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.29.6.127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:29:y:1999:i:6:p:127-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.