IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v29y1999i3p63-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Casey's Problem: Interpreting and Evaluating a New Test

Author

Listed:
  • James E. Smith

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

  • Robert L. Winkler

    (Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708)

Abstract

Casey, the newborn daughter of one of the authors of this paper, received a positive result on an experimental medical screening test, indicating that she may lack an enzyme required to digest certain fats. The interpretation of this test result was complicated by uncertainty about the false-positive rate for the test—this was the first positive reading—and the prevalence of the medical condition. We used a simple Bayesian model to help assess the probability that Casey actually had the enzyme deficiency and to help better understand the role and value of this screening test. The model we used and, more generally, our style of analysis could also be used with other new diagnostic tests, such as tests used in manufacturing and environmental contexts as well as other medical situations.

Suggested Citation

  • James E. Smith & Robert L. Winkler, 1999. "Casey's Problem: Interpreting and Evaluating a New Test," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 63-76, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:29:y:1999:i:3:p:63-76
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.29.3.63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.29.3.63
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.29.3.63?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:29:y:1999:i:3:p:63-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.