IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v12y1982i4p128-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Theories of Zero-Base Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • Duane Windsor

    (Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Administration, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, Texas 77251)

Abstract

The literature on zero-base budgeting (ZBB) has been confused by the implicit (but incorrect) assumption that there is a single, comprehensive theory of ZBB applicable to both the private and public sectors as well as to all levels of government. This assumption, which arises out of the circumstance that must authors and practitioners fail to distinguish properly between the theory and the method of ZBB, has strongly colored the ad hoc interpretation of user experiences with ZBB. Evaluation of ZBB efforts has occurred within the framework of a “theory” that literally does not exist. A specific set of techniques or procedures (decision packages prioritized or ranked by managers subject to budget guidelines) has been treated as a theory of ZBB (which must address the larger question of to which types of budgeting decisions those techniques can he successfully applied and under what environmental conditions). This paper argues that we require two theories of zero-base budgeting as well as a separate theory of zero-base review (ZBR) in the public sector. One theory of ZBB must deal with indirect costs in business or government: another theory of ZBB, with discretionary spending in government because of the environmental differences between the private and public sectors, and third, a theory of ZBR is needed for nondiscretionary spending in government. By extension of the analysis used to delineate these theories, we should anticipate possible variations by level of government and type of business (e.g., industrial versus service.).

Suggested Citation

  • Duane Windsor, 1982. "Two Theories of Zero-Base Budgeting," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 128-134, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:4:p:128-134
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.12.4.128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.4.128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.12.4.128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:4:p:128-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.