IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v12y1982i3p40-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Science Process---“Give the Kid a Number”: An Essay on the Folly and Consequences of Trusting Your Data

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Graham

Abstract

Most Management Scientists consider themselves realists. We believe there is a real world “out there,” that natural laws do indeed exist, that we can discover these laws, and that we can build mathematical models to study these laws. We draw heavily on the physical, biological, and mathematical sciences to help construct our world views. One of the most significant symbols in our world is data---the stuff forming the very foundation of our models, whose very existence confirm the reality that we assume. Data are numbers that reflect the hard facts of life---or so I was led to believe during my process of initiation to this field. However, in the years since my release from graduate school, I have yet to encounter any situation when the data reflected any agreed-upon “reality.” The usual situation is that there are many versions of reality and the data provided reflect an approximation of one version of this reality---maybe. Most likely, the data reflect what most people wish was reality or what people want you to believe is reality. The purpose of this essay is to review some of the common assumptions and misperceptions made about data and to examine the folly and consequences of believing the concept that objective data indeed exist.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Graham, 1982. "Management Science Process---“Give the Kid a Number”: An Essay on the Folly and Consequences of Trusting Your Data," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 40-44, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:3:p:40-44
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.12.3.40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.3.40
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.12.3.40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    professional; OR/MS philosophy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:12:y:1982:i:3:p:40-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.