IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v11y1981i3p80-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Science Process---Understanding the Benefits of Poor Communications

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Graham

Abstract

There have been many reports of Management Science projects failing to be implemented even when it seemed that there were clearly obvious benefits to be realized upon such implementation. One such benefit that is often assumed during a Management Science project is that the development and implementation of a model will help to improve communications in an organization. This is particularly true with the normative type models such as PERT/CPM where improved communications is touted as one of the major benefits of the modelling process. Since better communication is often cited as a need in many organizations, one would think that models which aid in improving communications would be sought after with vigor. But experience has shown otherwise. This could lead one to surmise that better communication is not a desired goal in some organizations and that perhaps there are some people actually benefitting from poor communication. This essay will address the idea of the benefits of poor communication and argue that consideration of the effects of such benefits should be a part of any Management Science process.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Graham, 1981. "Management Science Process---Understanding the Benefits of Poor Communications," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 80-82, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:3:p:80-82
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.11.3.80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.11.3.80
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.11.3.80?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    communications: philosophy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:11:y:1981:i:3:p:80-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.