IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v30y2018i2p278-294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Monotonicity Results for Stochastic Kriging Metamodels in Sequential Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Wang

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794)

  • Jiaqiao Hu

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794)

Abstract

Stochastic kriging (SK) and stochastic kriging with gradient estimators (SKG) are useful methods for effectively approximating the response surface of a simulation model. In this paper, we show that in a fully sequential setting when all model parameters are known, the mean squared errors of the optimal SK and SKG predictors are monotonically decreasing as the number of design points increases. In addition, we prove, under appropriate conditions, that the use of gradient information in the SKG framework generally improves the prediction performance of SK. Motivated by these findings, we propose a sequential procedure for adaptively choosing design points and simulation replications in obtaining SK (SKG) predictors with desired levels of fidelity. We justify the validity of the procedure and carry out numerical experiments to illustrate its performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Wang & Jiaqiao Hu, 2018. "Some Monotonicity Results for Stochastic Kriging Metamodels in Sequential Settings," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 278-294, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:278-294
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2017.0779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2017.0779
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2017.0779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D den Hertog & J P C Kleijnen & A Y D Siem, 2006. "The correct Kriging variance estimated by bootstrapping," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(4), pages 400-409, April.
    2. Kuo-Hao Chang & L. Jeff Hong & Hong Wan, 2013. "Stochastic Trust-Region Response-Surface Method (STRONG)---A New Response-Surface Framework for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 230-243, May.
    3. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2009. "Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 707-716, February.
    4. Jiaqiao Hu & Ping Hu, 2011. "Annealing adaptive search, cross‐entropy, and stochastic approximation in global optimization," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 457-477, August.
    5. Bruce Ankenman & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2010. "Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 371-382, April.
    6. Wei Xie & Barry L. Nelson & Russell R. Barton, 2014. "A Bayesian Framework for Quantifying Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1439-1452, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng Li & Siyang Gao & Jianzhong Du, 2023. "Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Kriging-Assisted Simulation with Random Covariates," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 386-402, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    2. Mehdad, E. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2014. "Classic Kriging versus Kriging with Bootstrapping or Conditional Simulation : Classic Kriging's Robust Confidence Intervals and Optimization (Revised version of CentER DP 2013-038)," Other publications TiSEM 4915047b-afe4-4fc7-8a1c-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    4. J P C Kleijnen & W C M van Beers, 2013. "Monotonicity-preserving bootstrapped Kriging metamodels for expensive simulations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(5), pages 708-717, May.
    5. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2013. "Simulation-Optimization via Kriging and Bootstrapping : A Survey (Revision of CentER DP 2011-064)," Other publications TiSEM 6ac4e049-ad86-447f-aeec-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Zhang, Wei & (Ato) Xu, Wangtu, 2017. "Simulation-based robust optimization for the schedule of single-direction bus transit route: The design of experiment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 203-230.
    7. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2015. "Response Surface Methodology," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Michael C Fu (ed.), Handbook of Simulation Optimization, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 81-104, Springer.
    8. Cheng Li & Siyang Gao & Jianzhong Du, 2023. "Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Kriging-Assisted Simulation with Random Covariates," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 386-402, March.
    9. Zilong Wang & Marianthi Ierapetritou, 2018. "Surrogate-based feasibility analysis for black-box stochastic simulations with heteroscedastic noise," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 957-985, August.
    10. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    11. Logan Mathesen & Giulia Pedrielli & Szu Hui Ng & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2021. "Stochastic optimization with adaptive restart: a framework for integrated local and global learning," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 87-110, January.
    12. Scott L. Rosen & Christopher P. Saunders & Samar K Guharay, 2015. "A Structured Approach for Rapidly Mapping Multilevel System Measures via Simulation Metamodeling," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 87-101, January.
    13. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & van Beers, W.C.M. & van Nieuwenhuyse, I., 2011. "Expected Improvement in Efficient Global Optimization Through Bootstrapped Kriging - Replaces CentER DP 2010-62," Discussion Paper 2011-015, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & van Beers, W.C.M. & van Nieuwenhuyse, I., 2008. "Constrained Optimization in Simulation : A Novel Approach," Discussion Paper 2008-95, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Xin Yun & L. Jeff Hong & Guangxin Jiang & Shouyang Wang, 2019. "On gamma estimation via matrix kriging," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(5), pages 393-410, August.
    16. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Beers, Wim van & Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke van, 2010. "Constrained optimization in expensive simulation: Novel approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 164-174, April.
    17. Jack Kleijnen & Wim Beers & Inneke Nieuwenhuyse, 2012. "Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 59-73, September.
    18. Helin Zhu & Tianyi Liu & Enlu Zhou, 2015. "Risk Quantification in Stochastic Simulation under Input Uncertainty," Papers 1507.06015, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    19. Ouyang, Linhan & Ma, Yizhong & Wang, Jianjun & Tu, Yiliu, 2017. "A new loss function for multi-response optimization with model parameter uncertainty and implementation errors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 552-563.
    20. Hernandez, Andres F. & Grover, Martha A., 2013. "Error estimation properties of Gaussian process models in stochastic simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 131-140.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:30:y:2018:i:2:p:278-294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.