IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ordeca/v16y2019i3p218-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archimedean Utility Copulas with Polynomial Generating Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Ali E. Abbas

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Department of Public Policy, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089; Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089)

  • Zhengwei Sun

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

Archimedean utility copulas comprise the general class of multiattribute utility functions that have additive ordinal preferences and are strictly increasing with each argument for at least one reference value of the complementary attributes. The construction of an Archimedean utility copula requires an assessment of an individual utility function for each attribute as well as a single generating function. The assessment of individual utility functions for the attributes of a decision has had a large share of literature coverage, but there has been much less literature on the construction of the generating function for the Archimedean functional form. This paper focuses on the assessment of Archimedean utility copulas with polynomial generating functions. We provide methods to assess these generating functions and derive bounds on the types of utility surfaces that they provide. We demonstrate that linear generating functions correspond to the multiplicative form of mutual utility independence, and then we show how higher-order polynomial generating functions allow more flexibility in the types of multiattribute utility functions and corner values that can be modeled. The results of this paper provide a new method to help the analyst construct multiattribute utility functions in a simple way when utility independence conditions do not hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali E. Abbas & Zhengwei Sun, 2019. "Archimedean Utility Copulas with Polynomial Generating Functions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 218-237, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:218-237
    DOI: 10.1287/deca.2018.0386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2018.0386
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/deca.2018.0386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James S. Dyer & Rakesh K. Sarin, 1982. "Relative Risk Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(8), pages 875-886, August.
    2. Ralph L. Keeney & Timothy L. McDaniels, 1992. "Value-Focused Thinking about Strategic Decisions at BC Hydro," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 94-109, December.
    3. Ali E. Abbas, 2007. "Invariant Utility Functions and Certain Equivalent Transformations," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 17-31, March.
    4. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2011. "One-Switch Independence for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 764-771, June.
    5. Ali E. Abbas, 2009. "Multiattribute Utility Copulas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1367-1383, December.
    6. Thomas W. Keelin, 1981. "A Parametric Representation of Additive Value Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(10), pages 1200-1208, October.
    7. Ali E. Abbas & Zhengwei Sun, 2015. "Multiattribute Utility Functions Satisfying Mutual Preferential Independence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 378-393, April.
    8. Kenneth C. Lichtendahl & Samuel E. Bodily, 2012. "Multiplicative Utilities for Health and Consumption," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 314-328, December.
    9. Abbas,Ali E., 2018. "Foundations of Multiattribute Utility," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107150904.
    10. Hutton Barron & Charles P. Schmidt, 1988. "Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multiattribute Value Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 122-127, February.
    11. David E. Bell, 1988. "One-Switch Utility Functions and a Measure of Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(12), pages 1416-1424, December.
    12. James S. Dyer & Rakesh K. Sarin, 1979. "Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 810-822, August.
    13. David E. Bell, 1979. "Consistent Assessment Procedures Using Conditional Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1054-1066, October.
    14. Ali E. Abbas & Ronald A. Howard, 2005. "Attribute Dominance Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 185-206, December.
    15. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2015. "Ordinal One-Switch Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1411-1419, December.
    16. Ralph L. Keeney, 1974. "Multiplicative Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 22-34, February.
    17. Luis V. Montiel & J. Eric Bickel, 2014. "A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 147-170, September.
    18. Peter H. Farquhar, 1975. "A Fractional Hypercube Decomposition Theorem for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 941-967, October.
    19. Ronald A. Howard, 1984. "On Fates Comparable to Death," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 407-422, April.
    20. Ali E. Abbas, 2013. "Utility Copula Functions Matching All Boundary Assessments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 359-371, April.
    21. David E. Bell, 1979. "Multiattribute Utility Functions: Decompositions Using Interpolation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(8), pages 744-753, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauricio Lopez-Mendez & Rowan Iskandar & Eric Jutkowitz, 2023. "Individual and Dyadic Health-Related Quality of Life of People Living with Dementia and their Caregivers," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1673-1692, August.
    2. Vicki M. Bier & Simon French, 2020. "From the Editors: Decision Analysis Focus and Trends," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 1-8, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali E. Abbas & Zhengwei Sun, 2015. "Multiattribute Utility Functions Satisfying Mutual Preferential Independence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 378-393, April.
    2. Ali E. Abbas, 2013. "Utility Copula Functions Matching All Boundary Assessments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 359-371, April.
    3. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2015. "Ordinal One-Switch Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1411-1419, December.
    4. Ali E. Abbas, 2011. "The Multiattribute Utility Tree," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 180-205, September.
    5. Andrea C. Hupman & Jay Simon, 2023. "The Legacy of Peter Fishburn: Foundational Work and Lasting Impact," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Jiehua Xie & Zhengyong Zhou, 2022. "Patchwork Constructions of Multiattribute Utility Functions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 141-169, June.
    7. Ali E. Abbas & Ronald A. Howard, 2005. "Attribute Dominance Utility," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 185-206, December.
    8. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2012. "METHODS---One-Switch Conditions for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1199-1212, October.
    9. Ali E. Abbas, 2009. "Multiattribute Utility Copulas," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1367-1383, December.
    10. Ali E. Abbas & David E. Bell, 2011. "One-Switch Independence for Multiattribute Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 764-771, June.
    11. Ying He & James S. Dyer & John C. Butler, 2014. "Decomposing a Utility Function Based on Discrete Distribution Independence," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 233-249, December.
    12. William B. Haskell & J. George Shanthikumar & Z. Max Shen, 2017. "Aspects of optimization with stochastic dominance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(1), pages 247-273, June.
    13. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    14. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    15. L. Robin Keller & Jay Simon, 2019. "Preference Functions for Spatial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 244-256, January.
    16. Mauricio Lopez-Mendez & Rowan Iskandar & Eric Jutkowitz, 2023. "Individual and Dyadic Health-Related Quality of Life of People Living with Dementia and their Caregivers," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1673-1692, August.
    17. Ali E. Abbas & János Aczél, 2010. "The Role of Some Functional Equations in Decision Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 215-228, June.
    18. Nina Anchugina, 2017. "One-Switch Discount Functions," Papers 1702.02254, arXiv.org.
    19. Kenneth C. Lichtendahl & Raul O. Chao & Samuel E. Bodily, 2012. "Habit Formation from Correlation Aversion," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 625-637, June.
    20. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2015. "On the decomposition of Generalized Additive Independence models," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15064, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:218-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.