IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ordeca/v11y2014i4p250-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation for Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Recourse

Author

Listed:
  • Tahir Ekin

    (McCoy College of Business, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas 78666)

  • Nicholas G. Polson

    (Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637)

  • Refik Soyer

    (School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052)

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a simulation-based approach for two-stage stochastic programs with recourse. We construct an augmented probability model with stochastic shocks and decision variables. Simulating from the augmented probability model solves for the expected recourse function and the optimal first-stage decision. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, together with ergodic averaging, provide a framework to compute the optimal solution. We illustrate our methodology via the two-stage newsvendor problem with unimodal and bimodal continuous uncertainty. Finally, we present performance comparisons of our algorithm and the sample average approximation method.

Suggested Citation

  • Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2014. "Augmented Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation for Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Recourse," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 250-264, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:11:y:2014:i:4:p:250-264
    DOI: 10.1287/deca.2014.0303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/deca.2014.0303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/deca.2014.0303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Concha Bielza & Peter Müller & David Ríos Insua, 1999. "Decision Analysis by Augmented Probability Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 995-1007, July.
    2. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    3. Julia L. Higle & Suvrajeet Sen, 1991. "Stochastic Decomposition: An Algorithm for Two-Stage Linear Programs with Recourse," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 650-669, August.
    4. Tore Jonsbråten & Roger Wets & David Woodruff, 1998. "A class of stochastic programs withdecision dependent random elements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 83-106, August.
    5. Peter Muller & Bruno Sanso & Maria De Iorio, 2004. "Optimal Bayesian Design by Inhomogeneous Markov Chain Simulation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 788-798, January.
    6. L. Dai & C. H. Chen & J. R. Birge, 2000. "Convergence Properties of Two-Stage Stochastic Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 489-509, September.
    7. Teemu Pennanen, 2005. "Epi-Convergent Discretizations of Multistage Stochastic Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 245-256, February.
    8. Martin Pincus, 1970. "Letter to the Editor—A Monte Carlo Method for the Approximate Solution of Certain Types of Constrained Optimization Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 1225-1228, December.
    9. Martin Pincus, 1968. "Letter to the Editor—-A Closed Form Solution of Certain Programming Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 690-694, June.
    10. Birge, John R. & Louveaux, Francois V., 1988. "A multicut algorithm for two-stage stochastic linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 384-392, March.
    11. Jacquier, Eric & Johannes, Michael & Polson, Nicholas, 2007. "MCMC maximum likelihood for latent state models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 615-640, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huidong Zhang & Dragan Djurdjanovic, 2022. "Integrated production and maintenance planning under uncertain demand with concurrent learning of yield rate," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 429-450, June.
    2. Ekin, Tahir & Aktekin, Tevfik, 2021. "Decision making under uncertain and dependent system rates in service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 335-348.
    3. Tahir Ekin & Stephen Walker & Paul Damien, 2023. "Augmented simulation methods for discrete stochastic optimization with recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 771-793, January.
    4. Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2017. "Augmented nested sampling for stochastic programs with recourse and endogenous uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 613-627, December.
    5. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    6. Tevfik Aktekin & Tahir Ekin, 2016. "Stochastic call center staffing with uncertain arrival, service and abandonment rates: A Bayesian perspective," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(6), pages 460-478, September.
    7. Ekin, Tahir & Naveiro, Roi & Ríos Insua, David & Torres-Barrán, Alberto, 2023. "Augmented probability simulation methods for sequential games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 418-430.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tahir Ekin & Nicholas G. Polson & Refik Soyer, 2017. "Augmented nested sampling for stochastic programs with recourse and endogenous uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 613-627, December.
    2. Ekin, Tahir, 2018. "Integrated maintenance and production planning with endogenous uncertain yield," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 52-61.
    3. Tahir Ekin & Stephen Walker & Paul Damien, 2023. "Augmented simulation methods for discrete stochastic optimization with recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 771-793, January.
    4. Tevfik Aktekin & Tahir Ekin, 2016. "Stochastic call center staffing with uncertain arrival, service and abandonment rates: A Bayesian perspective," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(6), pages 460-478, September.
    5. Song, Haiqing & Cheung, Raymond K. & Wang, Haiyan, 2014. "An arc-exchange decomposition method for multistage dynamic networks with random arc capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 474-487.
    6. C.H. Rosa & D. Yates, 1994. "Addressing the Issue of Uncertainty Within the Egyptian Agricultural Sector," Working Papers wp94097, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    7. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.
    8. Ketabchi, Saeed & Behboodi-Kahoo, Malihe, 2015. "Augmented Lagrangian method within L-shaped method for stochastic linear programs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 12-20.
    9. Riis, Morten & Andersen, Kim Allan, 2005. "Applying the minimax criterion in stochastic recourse programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 569-584, September.
    10. Fei, Xin & Gülpınar, Nalân & Branke, Jürgen, 2019. "Efficient solution selection for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 918-929.
    11. Maqsood, Imran & Huang, Guo H. & Scott Yeomans, Julian, 2005. "An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 208-225, November.
    12. Messina, E. & Mitra, G., 1997. "Modelling and analysis of multistage stochastic programming problems: A software environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 343-359, September.
    13. C. Li & L. Zhang, 2015. "An Inexact Two-Stage Allocation Model for Water Resources Management Under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(6), pages 1823-1841, April.
    14. Bora Tarhan & Ignacio Grossmann & Vikas Goel, 2013. "Computational strategies for non-convex multistage MINLP models with decision-dependent uncertainty and gradual uncertainty resolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 141-166, March.
    15. Trukhanov, Svyatoslav & Ntaimo, Lewis & Schaefer, Andrew, 2010. "Adaptive multicut aggregation for two-stage stochastic linear programs with recourse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 395-406, October.
    16. Escudero, L. F. & Galindo, E. & Garcia, G. & Gomez, E. & Sabau, V., 1999. "Schumann, a modeling framework for supply chain management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 14-34, November.
    17. Blanchot, Xavier & Clautiaux, François & Detienne, Boris & Froger, Aurélien & Ruiz, Manuel, 2023. "The Benders by batch algorithm: Design and stabilization of an enhanced algorithm to solve multicut Benders reformulation of two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 202-216.
    18. N. Edirisinghe & E. Patterson, 2007. "Multi-period stochastic portfolio optimization: Block-separable decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 367-394, July.
    19. Martin Biel & Mikael Johansson, 2022. "Efficient Stochastic Programming in Julia," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1885-1902, July.
    20. Ekin, Tahir & Naveiro, Roi & Ríos Insua, David & Torres-Barrán, Alberto, 2023. "Augmented probability simulation methods for sequential games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 418-430.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ordeca:v:11:y:2014:i:4:p:250-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.