IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ime/imemes/v33y2015p29-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mayekawa Lecture: Wall of Worries: Reflections on the Secular Stagnation Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Eichengreen

Abstract

This paper offers some reflections on the debate over secular stagnation. It expresses doubts about explanations for the secular decline in real interest rates and economic growth rates that emphasize the possibility of a global savings glut attributable to the rapid growth of emerging markets and increases in income inequality in the advanced economies. It invokes historical evidence to question whether the commercial potential of new advances in technology have been exhausted. The most convincing explanation for the observed excess of desired saving over desired investment and corresponding low level of real interest rates, it concludes, is probably a sharp, ongoing fall in the relative price of investment goods since the middle of the 20th century. Whether this decline will continue is uncertain. The bottom line is that the case for secular stagnation is at best unproven.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Eichengreen, 2015. "The Mayekawa Lecture: Wall of Worries: Reflections on the Secular Stagnation Debate," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 33, pages 29-44, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ime:imemes:v:33:y:2015:p:29-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/me33-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hareesh Kumar A G & Dr. Thomas Paul Kattookaran, 2016. "Secular Stagnation: An Introduction," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 7(3), pages 42-47, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ime:imemes:v:33:y:2015:p:29-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kinken (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.