IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijb/journl/v17y2018i3p193-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Relative Risk Aversion with Data from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board¡¦s Survey of Consumer Finances

Author

Listed:
  • Efstathia Korkou

    (School of Business and Information Systems, York College, The City University of New York, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Earlier research has presented a pattern of decreasing financial relative risk aversion to all types of households, yet greater financial relative risk aversion by women versus men. This current paper brings into light new important evidence about the relative risk aversion of female investors over time working with data from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board¡¦s Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) for 1989 and 2013 with the latter year reflecting the after-effect of the 2007-2008 financial crisis period. Employing Repeated-Imputation Inference (RII) techniques, we replicate existing results from the 1989 SCF and seek new results from the 2013 SCF. The 1989 results are in large corroborated, while the new results from 2013 indicate a reverse path of increasing (for single-headed households) and constant (for married couples) relative risk aversion, where gender differences persist. Based on our 2013 results, we offer policy and practice improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Efstathia Korkou, 2018. "Gender Differences in Relative Risk Aversion with Data from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board¡¦s Survey of Consumer Finances," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 17(3), pages 193-211, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:193-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.17-3/pdf/vol_17-3-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijbe.fcu.edu.tw/assets/ijbe/past_issue/No.17-3/abstract/01.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    relative risk aversion; individual investors; gender differences; survey of consumer finances; replication; RII techniques; policymaking;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijb:journl:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:193-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Szu-Hsien Ho (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbfcutw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.