A New Test of Asymmetric Stationarity in the Presence of Deterministic Trends: Simulation and Empirical Evidence
AbstractUsing local-to-unity detrending, a modified momentum-threshold autoregressive test is derived to allow the unit root hypothesis to be tested against an alternative of asymmetric stationarity about a deterministic trend. Monte Carlo evidence is presented to show the increased power of the proposed test in the presence of asymmetric adjustment relative to the familiar Dickey-Fuller (1979) test and the momentum-threshold autoregressive test of Enders and Granger (1998). The empirical relevance of the test is illustrated via an application to New Zealand national output over the period 1870-2001, where in contrast to findings obtained using alternative unit root tests, the unit root hypothesis is conclusively rejected.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Department of General Business, Southeastern Louisiana University in its journal The International Journal of Applied Economics.
Volume (Year): 1 (2004)
Issue (Month): 1 (September)
Unit root tests; local-to-unity detrending; momentum-threshold autoregression;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dr. Yu Hsing).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.