IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v6y1993i3p36-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Dutch Methodologies for Information Planning and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Robert A. Stegwee

    (University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ernst W.L. Berkhout

    (University of Groningen, Netherlands)

  • Marleen M. Keet

    (University of Groningen, Netherlands)

Abstract

In this paper a comparison is given of dutch methodologies for information planning and policy. This is done on the basis of three frameworks: Galliers, Stegwee and Van Waes, and Theeuwes. Galliers is used to give an overview, the other two frameworks are used to give a more detailed picture. The frameworks are joined, to be useful as a tool for positioning the selected methodologies. Most of the methodologies we describe were developed between 1989 and 1992. They mostly cover business-issue-driven characteristics. SDM is an exception. First developed in 1974, it gives a view of information planning in the earlier years. However, there is not much difference between the recent methodologies and SDM. In general, one can say that pro-active and strategically oriented methodologies are lacking. Moreover, most methodologies lack a sound foundation with respect to the design and development aspect. This conclusion corroborates empirical findings, which report that the link between information systems planning and information systems design and development is cumbersome

Suggested Citation

  • Robert A. Stegwee & Ernst W.L. Berkhout & Marleen M. Keet, 1993. "A Comparison of Dutch Methodologies for Information Planning and Policy," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 36-44, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:6:y:1993:i:3:p:36-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.1993070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:6:y:1993:i:3:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.