IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsita0/v2y2011i2p67-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studies on Utilizing the Three Famous International Index Systems to Evaluate Scientific Research Level of Higher Learning Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Xun Liu

    (Beijing University of Technology, China)

  • Changyu Huang

    (Beijing University of Technology and Chinese Academy of Sciences, China)

  • Wei-Liang Qian

    (Beijing University of Technology, China)

  • Yong-Chang Huang

    (Beijing University of Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and CCAST, China)

Abstract

Science Citation Index (SCI), The Engineering Index (EI), and Index to Scientific & Technical Proceeding (ISTP) are widely accepted and used to evaluate the scientific research level of higher learning institutions by many countries’ science and technology field currently. After research, the authors point out the blemishes in this method and put forward the problems that need to be noticed, and then, under current conditions, bring forward brand-new standards and methods to estimate research level, efficiency, and fund exploitation. One shouldn’t over-emphasize the total amount of papers collected in SCI, EI & ISTP when evaluating the scientific research level of higher learning institutions, whereas using ‘comprehensive factor’ analysis method can make it more scientific and efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Xun Liu & Changyu Huang & Wei-Liang Qian & Yong-Chang Huang, 2011. "Studies on Utilizing the Three Famous International Index Systems to Evaluate Scientific Research Level of Higher Learning Institutions," International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications (IJSITA), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 67-77, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsita0:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:67-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jsita.2011040105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsita0:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:67-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.