IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsir00/v12y2021i1p17-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Classification Using KEEL Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Amrit Pal Singh

    (Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, India)

  • Chetna Gupta

    (Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, India)

  • Rashpal Singh

    (Citi, Canada)

  • Nandini Singh

    (Nucleus Software, India)

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are inspired by the biological model of evolution and natural selection and are used to solve computationally hard problems, also known as NP-hard problems. The main motive to use these algorithms is their robust and adaptive nature to provide best search techniques for complex problems. This paper presents a comparative analysis of classification of algorithm's family instead of algorithms comparison using KEEL tool. This work compares SSMA-C, DROP3PSO-C, FURIA-C, GFS-MaxLogitBoost-Cand CPSO-C algorithms. Further, these selected evolutionary algorithms are compared against two statistical classifiers using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Friedman test on following datasets—bupa, ecoli, glass, haberman, iris, monks, vehicle, and wine—to calculate classification efficiencies of these algorithms. Experimental results reveal some differences among these algorithms. Visualization module in the model has been used to give overall results as a summary while statistical test using Clas-Wilcoxin-ST compared the algorithms in a pair-wise fashion to conclude experimental findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Amrit Pal Singh & Chetna Gupta & Rashpal Singh & Nandini Singh, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms for Data Classification Using KEEL Tool," International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 17-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsir00:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSIR.2021010102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsir00:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.