IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsem00/v9y2020i3p33-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Opinion Leaders in Green Consumption in Taiwan Using the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)

Author

Listed:
  • Chih-Ping Chen

    (Yuan Ze University, Taiwan)

  • Yanbin Tu

    (Robert Morris University, USA)

  • Y. Alex Tung

    (University of Connecticut, USA)

Abstract

Environmental and health concerns have prompted consumers to more carefully plan their food consumption. This can be evidenced by the increasing number of organic grocery stores in the past two decades. To date, consumer awareness in Western countries about environmentally friendly and healthy products is considerably high. However, in emerging economies, the concept of green/organic products and healthy lifestyles is still at early stages. Prior studies show that opinion leadership in many markets is the single strongest factor leading to the final purchase decision. In this research, the authors propose a conceptual framework using the well-known theory of reasoned action (TRA) to study consumers' green consumption attitude and behavior in Taiwan. The findings reveal that opinion leaders (OLs) play an important role in product awareness and information diffusion of green products in emerging markets. This paper contributes to the literature by applying the TRA using opinion leaders and validating the theory in the area of green consumption. We also discuss managerial implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Chih-Ping Chen & Yanbin Tu & Y. Alex Tung, 2020. "A Study of Opinion Leaders in Green Consumption in Taiwan Using the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)," International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management (IJSEM), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 33-50, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsem00:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:33-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSEM.2020070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsem00:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.