IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrcm00/v5y2016i4p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Literature Review on Construction Project Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ermias Tesfaye

    (Addis Ababa Institute of Technology; Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

  • Eshetie Berhan

    (Addis Ababa Institute of Technology; Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

  • Daniel Kitaw

    (Addis Ababa Institute of Technology; Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the chronological development of risk assessment techniques and models undertaken in construction project for the past two decades. This research used a systematic review and meta-analysis on risk assessment of construction project literatures. This includes browsing relevant researches and publications, screening articles based on the year of publication, identifying the domains and attributes. Accordingly, findings of major results achieved have been presented systematically based on the chronology of the research and research gaps are identified. From the review, it is found out that the dominant risk assessment tools used for the past twenty years is statistical analysis and fuzzy expert system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ermias Tesfaye & Eshetie Berhan & Daniel Kitaw, 2016. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Construction Project Risk Analysis," International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), IGI Global, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJRCM.2016100101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Najib Razali & Rohaya Abdul Jalil & Kamalahasan Achu & Hishamuddin Mohd Ali, 2022. "Identification of Risk Factors in Business Valuation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:5:y:2016:i:4:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.