IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jrcm00/v2y2013i4p79-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Risk Management: Use and Benefit of Various Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Terje Karlsen

    (Norwegian Business School BI, Oslo, Norway)

  • Odin Folke-Olsen

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

  • Tim Torvatn

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

This study is about project risk management tools. The aim has been to identify which tools have the greatest potential for contribution to risk management processes in the Norwegian oil and gas industry, and which factors contribute to efficient risk management. Empirical data from the Norwegian industry have been gathered using a questionnaire. The results revealed strong relationships between project system complexity, average tool score and risk management contribution. Furthermore, the results of the analysis show that some of the previous recommendations of tools for project risk management may have been based on a restricted set of determinants. On the other hand, similarities are also found with previous research in terms of the highest ranked tools based on perceived contribution to the risk management performance. Compared to the previous findings, this study indicates that a new measure for project management performance is needed, and that the recommendation of tools based on the risk management contribution index may be flawed. Nevertheless, it is concluded that several of the recommended tools are of great value across industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Terje Karlsen & Odin Folke-Olsen & Tim Torvatn, 2013. "Project Risk Management: Use and Benefit of Various Tools," International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management (IJRCM), IGI Global, vol. 2(4), pages 79-101, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:79-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijrcm.2013100106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jrcm00:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:79-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.