IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jopcd0/v6y2016i2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of E-Learning: A Game Theory Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Celia Romm-Livermore

    (Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA)

  • Mahesh S. Raisinghani

    (Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, USA)

  • Pierlugi Rippa

    (University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The focus of this article is on how the negotiations between professors and students that are part of the eLearning political process can be interpreted through the prism of game theory. The source of data for the case was a series of in-depth interviews with the professor and an analysis of the e-mail messages exchanged between the professor, the students, and management. Each round of the game represents a different combination of positions, strategies and outcomes, yet, taken as a whole, the case events suggest underlying themes that, if been identified by the two sides, could have led to different outcomes. The discussion and conclusions section outlines the rules that governed the behaviour of the actors from a game theory perspective. This case is unique and, hence, the conclusions from it are not necessarily generalizable. Management's role in the games that people play in the eLearning area is crucial in the newly emerging corporatized university. Game theory analysis is applied in this paper to a four-round negotiation process between students and their professor in the context of an eLearning case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Celia Romm-Livermore & Mahesh S. Raisinghani & Pierlugi Rippa, 2016. "The Politics of E-Learning: A Game Theory Analysis," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJOPCD.2016040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.