IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jisss0/v10y2018i1p71-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management Models: A Summative Review

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Indra Sensuse

    (Faculty of Computer Science, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia)

  • Elin Cahyaningsih

    (Faculty of Computer Science, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia)

Abstract

Knowledge and knowledge management started to be an option of organizational strategic step for reach organizational objectives and goals. Knowledge management believed to resolve organizational problem in managing their organizational and individual knowledge. Implementation of knowledge management (KM) has received increased interests. This paper aims to discuss KM models based on KM related definitions, concepts, functions, activities and approaches. Literatures on knowledge management models were collected from a number of sources. Each document then was analyzed and categorized in a certain group. The study shows that there are four categories of KM models i.e.: process, strategy, knowledge type, and maturity based knowledge management models.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Indra Sensuse & Elin Cahyaningsih, 2018. "Knowledge Management Models: A Summative Review," International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 71-100, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:71-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJISSS.2018010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Francisco Rodríguez-Pecci, 2021. "Knowledge as an Organizational Asset for Managing Complex Projects: The Case of Naval Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:71-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.