IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jismd0/v3y2012i2p1-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Perceived End-Product Quality in Software-Developing Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Jussi Kasurinen

    (Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland)

  • Ossi Taipale

    (Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland)

  • Jari Vanhanen

    (Aalto University, Finland)

  • Kari Smolander

    (Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland)

Abstract

Software projects have four main objectives; produce required functionalities, with acceptable quality, in budget and in schedule. These objectives are all important for software projects to be successful, but how does the end-product quality fit to them? The objective of this study is to explore how organizations understand software quality and identify factors which seem to affect the quality outcome of the development process. The study applies three approaches; a quantitative survey with 31 organizations, qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 36 software professionals, and four workshops for identifying and prioritizing quality goals. The study revealed that quality in software organization is not a single, easily definable entity, but a complex, interconnected concept fluctuating between the stakeholders. Overall, it seems that there is no general consensus over the important quality characteristics in software organizations and therefore software organizations could benefit from identifying the quality characteristics they consider important, and actively pursuing quality goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Jussi Kasurinen & Ossi Taipale & Jari Vanhanen & Kari Smolander, 2012. "Exploring the Perceived End-Product Quality in Software-Developing Organizations," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jismd0:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:1-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jismd.2012040101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jismd0:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:1-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.