IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeco00/v20y2022i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Social Media Make Us More Trusting?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Bohler

    (Troy University, USA)

  • John R. Drake

    (East Carolina University, USA)

  • Ravi R. Paul

    (East Carolina University, USA)

  • Eric L. Kisling

    (East Carolina University, USA)

Abstract

The usage of social networking sites requires continuous trusting actions through the sharing of personal information. According to social cognitive theory, such behavior and resulting experiences should have an impact on the beliefs that led to the behavior. In this study, the authors explore how usage of social networking sites impacts the disposition to trust. A model of how this process takes place is developed. The results of a survey suggest that increasing usage of social networking sites increases disposition to trust, mediated by optimism, innovativeness, and trust in the social networking site. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Bohler & John R. Drake & Ravi R. Paul & Eric L. Kisling, 2022. "Can Social Media Make Us More Trusting?," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 20(1), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JECO.305738
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Belleflamme & Julien Jacqmin, 2016. "An Economic Appraisal of MOOC Platforms: Business Models and Impacts on Higher Education," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 62(1), pages 148-169.
    2. Markus Schief, 2014. "Business Models in the Software Industry," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-658-04352-0, December.
    3. Schief, Markus & Buxmann, Peter, 2012. "Business Models in the Software Industry," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 54270, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqmin, Julien, 2018. "Why are some online courses more open than others?," MPRA Paper 89929, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Emilie Dargaud & Frédéric Jouneau-Sion, 2019. "The good MOOC and the universities," Working Papers halshs-01996582, HAL.
    3. Emilie Dargaud & Fréedéeric Jouneau-Sion, 2020. "The good MOOC and the universities," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 474-490, September.
    4. Xiaoyan Chen & Wei Geng, 2022. "Enroll now, pay later: optimal pricing and nudge efforts for massive-online-open-courses providers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 1003-1018, June.
    5. Gilbert E. Metcalf & James Stock, 2015. "The Role of Integrated Assessment Models in Climate Policy: A User's Guide and Assessment," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0811, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    6. Daniel Veit & Eric Clemons & Alexander Benlian & Peter Buxmann & Thomas Hess & Dennis Kundisch & Jan Leimeister & Peter Loos & Martin Spann, 2014. "Business Models," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(1), pages 45-53, February.
    7. Antonio Matas-Terrón & Juan José Leiva-Olivencia & Pablo Daniel Franco-Caballero & Francisco José García-Aguilera, 2020. "Validity of the “Big Data Tendency in Education” Scale as a Tool Helping to Reach Inclusive Social Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Jacqmin, Julien, 2019. "Providing MOOCs: A FUN way to enroll students?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 32-39.
    9. Lynne Pepall & Dan Richard, 2014. "Competition, Selectivity and Innovation in the Higher Educational Market," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0782, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    10. Antonio Matas-Terrón & Juan José Leiva-Olivencia & Cristina Negro-Martínez, 2020. "Tendency to Use Big Data in Education Based on Its Opportunities According to Andalusian Education Students," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Karl Taeuscher & Hannes Rothe, 2021. "Optimal distinctiveness in platform markets: Leveraging complementors as legitimacy buffers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 435-461, February.
    12. Belleflamme, Paul & Toulemonde, Eric, 2016. "Who benefits from increased competition among sellers on B2C platforms?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 741-751.
    13. Guerrero, Maribel & Heaton, Sohvi & Urbano, David, 2021. "Building universities’ intrapreneurial capabilities in the digital era: The role and impacts of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Jacqmin, Julien, 2022. "Why are some Massive Open Online Courses more open than others?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Emilie Dargaud & Frédéric Jouneau-Sion, 2019. "The good MOOC and the universities," Working Papers 1905, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    16. Jason Howarth & Steven D'Alessandro & Lester Johnson & Lesley White, 2017. "MOOCs to university: a consumer goal and marketing perspective," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 144-158, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.