IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jebr00/v2y2006i3p46-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploratory Study of the Design Preferences of U.S. and Chinese Virtual Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Felix B. Tan

    (Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand)

  • Helen J. Lin

    (University of Auckland, New Zealand)

  • Cathy Urquhart

    (University of Auckland, New Zealand)

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of electronic commerce, businesses are starting to recognise that developing a good virtual community can help to generate more profits. Virtual communities can be an instrument for building relationships with customers, and retaining customers’ loyalty. Of interest are the similarities and differences in the design preferences of virtual communities across cultural groups. This paper, therefore, examined the design preferences of virtual communities in two cultural groups. The design preferences studied are Web design, tools used, and types of virtual communities preferred. Content analysis was employed to study 20 of the most popular Chinese and U.S. virtual communities. The study found that there are differences in the preference for the type of virtual communities and the tools used by Chinese and U.S. communities. The findings challenge aspects of Web site design across these cultural groups thought to be dissimilar based on prior research, indicating that designers of virtual communities must treat cultural differences with caution. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix B. Tan & Helen J. Lin & Cathy Urquhart, 2006. "An Exploratory Study of the Design Preferences of U.S. and Chinese Virtual Communities," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 46-70, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:46-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jebr.2006070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:46-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.