IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v5y2013i3p49-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Olfactory Effects on Human Behavior within a Simulation Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Tanja Feit

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Graz, Graz, Austria)

  • Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger

    (Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Graz, Graz, Austria)

Abstract

In the study at hand, the authors pose the question how people are influenced by olfactory stimulation while solving an economic problem? The economic problem involves managing a strategic planning simulation experiment. To demonstrate the fundamental task of economic decisions, the authors run experiments in the laboratory. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between several economic parameters and a firm’s success within a simulation experiment. Teams of students are assigned the role of managers of a firm within a competitive market situation. Subjects had the task of managing the complex situation in which they act in a group as managers to increase the performance of a firm by setting specific parameters. The authors will demonstrate to what extent a strong peppermint scent is able to influence the decision-makers within such a reasonably complex situation when they are to manage a firm's product range and compete against other firms. The authors are able to show that the smell of peppermint improved the overall mood considerably and thus also the results of the given task.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanja Feit & Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger, 2013. "Olfactory Effects on Human Behavior within a Simulation Experiment," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 49-58, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:49-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jdsst.2013070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:5:y:2013:i:3:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.