IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdldc0/v7y2016i1p33-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impediments to Digital Fabrication in Education: A Study of Teachers' Role in Digital Fabrication

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Charlotte Smith

    (Centre for Participatory Information Technology (PIT), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Ole Sejer Iversen

    (Centre for Participatory Information Technology (PIT), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

  • Rune Veerasawmy

    (Centre for Participatory Information Technology (PIT), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark)

Abstract

Digital fabrication technologies are increasingly integrated across subjects in primary and secondary education. Focus on the potentials of these technologies has mainly been on the support to STEM oriented learning goals, while emphasis on teachers' roles with the new learning processes of technology and design is largely absent. The paper addresses the experiences and challenges that digital fabrication technology present for teachers in educational environments, and the impediments that are linked to the teachers' roles in design processes of digital fabrication. Based on a research study with eight primary and lower secondary teachers, the findings point to four central impediments for integrating digital fabrication and design into school environments. The findings extend current perceptions of digital technology in education towards exploratory processes of investigation in which the teachers' roles are fundamental.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Charlotte Smith & Ole Sejer Iversen & Rune Veerasawmy, 2016. "Impediments to Digital Fabrication in Education: A Study of Teachers' Role in Digital Fabrication," International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 33-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdldc0:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:33-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDLDC.2016010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdldc0:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:33-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.