IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v11y2021i1p21-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘I Am Proud of Myself': Student Satisfaction and Achievement on an Academic English Writing MOOC

Author

Listed:
  • Clare Wright

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Clare Furneaux

    (University of Reading, UK)

Abstract

This paper reports on a detailed thematic analysis of learners' evaluative comments at the end of a five-week academic writing MOOC run by a university in the UK which used a novel content+process MOOC approach. The authors wanted to identify whether this innovative approach to a MOOC course worked in terms of student satisfaction and achievement in mastering both the content and process of critically-based academic writing in second language (L2) English. The MOOC use of peer feedback, and limited availability of detailed expert feedback from educators and mentors, were the primary sources of negative evaluation. However, in general, they found an overwhelming delight in taking the course, demonstrating a clear sense of pride, achievement, and satisfaction of mastering an unfamiliar and difficult skill that many saw as crucial to their future life plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Clare Wright & Clare Furneaux, 2021. "‘I Am Proud of Myself': Student Satisfaction and Achievement on an Academic English Writing MOOC," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 21-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.2021010102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Min Wang & Chei-Chang Chiou, 2022. "Empirically Examining the Effectiveness of Teaching Blogs on University Course Instruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:21-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.