IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jban00/v11y2024i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps

Author

Listed:
  • Di Kevin Gao

    (California State University, East Bay, USA)

  • Andrew Haverly

    (Mississippi State University, USA)

  • Sudip Mittal

    (Mississippi State University, USA)

  • Jiming Wu

    (California State University, East Bay, USA)

  • Jingdao Chen

    (Mississippi State University, USA)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) ethics has emerged as a burgeoning yet pivotal area of scholarly research. This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the AI ethics literature over the past two decades. The analysis reveals a discernible tripartite progression, characterized by an incubation phase, followed by a subsequent phase focused on imbuing AI with human-like attributes, culminating in a third phase emphasizing the development of human-centric AI systems. After that, they present seven key AI ethics issues, encompassing the Collingridge dilemma, the AI status debate, challenges associated with AI transparency and explainability, privacy protection complications, considerations of justice and fairness, concerns about algocracy and human enfeeblement, and the issue of superintelligence. Finally, they identify two notable research gaps in AI ethics regarding the large ethics model (LEM) and AI identification and extend an invitation for further scholarly research.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Kevin Gao & Andrew Haverly & Sudip Mittal & Jiming Wu & Jingdao Chen, 2024. "AI Ethics: A Bibliometric Analysis, Critical Issues, and Key Gaps," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJBAN.338367
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:11:y:2024:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.