IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/wremsd/v7y2011i4p440-462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of overconfidence and gender on trading activity: how well do investors assess probability?

Author

Listed:
  • Mahatma Kufepaksi

Abstract

People unconsciously exhibit overconfident behaviour in the capital market. Previous empirical research demonstrates that there is no conclusive result whether male or female investors tend to be more overconfident. The purpose of this research is to investigate whether male investors tend to be more overconfident than female ones in an emerging capital market such as in Indonesian capital market. According to this experimental research design, all participants are classified into two groups based on their score of overconfidence, namely less informed investors, and more informed investors. This research employs three different types of treatments, but only two treatments will be analysed consisting of the state of no available market information, and the provision of good news. The result demonstrates that male and female investors perform the same level of overconfidence when there is no available market information. Male and female investors are more likely to perform higher mean of prediction errors when they are classified as less informed investors. Referring to both the more and the less informed investors, female investors tend to be more overconfident than male investors when the market provides a signal of good news.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahatma Kufepaksi, 2011. "The impact of overconfidence and gender on trading activity: how well do investors assess probability?," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 440-462.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:wremsd:v:7:y:2011:i:4:p:440-462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42895
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Spiwoks & Kilian Bizer, 2018. "On the Measurement of Overconfidence: An Experimental Study," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(1), pages 30-37, 01-2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:wremsd:v:7:y:2011:i:4:p:440-462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=173 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.