IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/intjaf/v8y2018i1p80-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-financial criteria in project appraisal methodologies: empirical evidence from Indian companies

Author

Listed:
  • Roopali Batra
  • Satish Verma

Abstract

There is an abundance of literature advocating the growing usage of sophisticated capital budgeting practices in corporate India. However, the qualitative aspects in project appraisal are still disregarded. Our research investigates the extent to which Indian companies incorporate non-financial criteria in their project appraisal practices. In addition it makes a contribution to project appraisal methodologies by presenting a comprehensive framework of factors to be considered in project selection. Based on a survey of 77 listed companies, SWOT analysis, customer market analysis, technical considerations, social considerations and necessity to maintain existing product lines emerged as important non-financial criteria in project appraisal. Gratifyingly, the qualitative criteria are used by almost all companies and only 2.6% of the companies do not use this type of criterion. Furthermore exploratory factor analysis identified technical factors, stakeholders' expectations, financial feasibility, social factors, strategic alignment and external factors as the prime factors affecting project selection. According to the authors' knowledge, this is the first study on the significance of non-financial criteria in project appraisal in a developing country like India.

Suggested Citation

  • Roopali Batra & Satish Verma, 2018. "Non-financial criteria in project appraisal methodologies: empirical evidence from Indian companies," International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 80-102.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:80-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:80-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=231 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.