IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/intjaf/v5y2015i2p117-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The information content of permanent versus transitory earnings: UK evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Wael Mostafa

Abstract

This study examines whether UK investors perceive permanent earnings to be different from transitory earnings. Specifically, the current study investigates the relative informativeness (measured by earnings response coefficient) of permanent earnings compared to transitory earnings. The study uses a contextual model (of the relation between stock returns and accounting earnings) with a dummy variable approach that allows parameter shifts for firm-years having transitory earnings. The results of the study indicate that the earnings response coefficient is significantly positive for permanent and transitory earnings. However, the earnings response coefficient is significantly higher for permanent earnings compared to transitory earnings. These results are consistent with US findings and suggest that permanent earnings have more information content than transitory earnings. The results of this study could reflect two different things if we think about a standard model in which price is the present value of future earnings: i) a given level of earnings will have greater implications for future earnings if the earnings are permanent, causing a larger stock price response; ii) firms with more volatile earnings could be riskier, and, therefore the discount rate would be higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Wael Mostafa, 2015. "The information content of permanent versus transitory earnings: UK evidence," International Journal of Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 117-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:117-132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=71832
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:117-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=231 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.