IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injsem/v2y2010i2p137-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and validity of new service development scale: using a balanced scorecard approach

Author

Listed:
  • Guoping Wu
  • Guofeng Gai
  • Ying Wang

Abstract

New Service Development (NSD) management has emerged as an important topic for service managers and researchers. In achieving long-term NSD success, it is vital that a firm have effective mechanisms for assessing success. This paper, focusing on the performance at programme level, aims to develop a measurement scale for NSD performance within balanced scorecard framework which includes financial performance, customer performance, internal performance, and learning and growth performance. We conduct a scale analysis using survey data collected from a sample of key informants in knowledge-intensive business services and confirm the reliability and validity of the proposed four multi-item scales. The NSD performance scales developed in this research may be used to advance scholarly understanding theory in NSD. Further, these NSD scales may provide a useful diagnostic and benchmarking tool for managers seeking to assess and/or improve their firm's service innovation expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoping Wu & Guofeng Gai & Ying Wang, 2010. "The development and validity of new service development scale: using a balanced scorecard approach," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 137-147.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:137-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30916
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:137-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=236 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.