IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v9y2017i1p44-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of voluntary disclosure on the volatility of firms from a multi-stakeholder perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Coluccia
  • Stefano Fontana
  • Silvia Solimene

Abstract

This paper is on the relationship between the level of voluntary disclosure related to many corporate stakeholders and the volatility of the market returns among a representative sample of Italian listed companies, in the years 2006, 2009 and 2012. The source of the disclosure is all the available mandatory and voluntary documents. We empirically tested the hypothesis that companies providing more disclosure show a lower volatility than do competitors. Our findings show that disclosure indexes all have a growing trend. Also, the evidence suggests that information disclosure may be useful to the market. Controlling a number of other factors, we found that industries that disclose more information show lower measures of stock volatility than others. We also have ascertained that customers, suppliers, communities, competitors and financial lenders and environment disclosure have a moderate effect on volatility, whereas institutions and human capital and corporate governance disclosure seem to have no effect on volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Coluccia & Stefano Fontana & Silvia Solimene, 2017. "The influence of voluntary disclosure on the volatility of firms from a multi-stakeholder perspective," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 44-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:44-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:44-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.