IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v10y2018i4p351-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of classifier ensembles for detecting inactive learner in university

Author

Listed:
  • Bayu Adhi Tama
  • Kyung-Hyune Rhee

Abstract

Prediction of undesirable learner's behaviours is an important issue in the distance learning system as well as the conventional university. This paper is devoted to benchmark ensemble of weak classifiers (decision tree, random forest, logistic regression, and CART) against single classifier models to predict inactive student. Two real-world datasets were obtained from a distance learning system and a computer science college in Indonesia. To evaluate the performance of the classifier ensembles, several performance metrics such as average accuracy, precision, recall, fall-out, F1, and area under ROC curve (AUC) value were involved. Our experiments reveal that classifier ensembles outperform single classifier in all evaluation metrics. This study contributes to the literature on making a comparative study of ensemble learners in the purview of educational data mining.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayu Adhi Tama & Kyung-Hyune Rhee, 2018. "A comparative study of classifier ensembles for detecting inactive learner in university," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 351-368.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:351-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:351-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.