IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v8y2011i3p365-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Total Quality Management implementation in Research and Development organisations: a comparative study of South Korea and Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Soon W. Hong
  • Cheng-Li Huang

Abstract

This paper examined Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation in Research and Development (R&D) organisations with empirical data from South Korean and Taiwanese manufacturing firms. A literature review established three hypotheses in regard to similarity in TQM implementation patterns, the impact of TQM for innovation performance and the mediating role of hard TQM. TQM measures were based on the six criteria of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, while innovation performance measures consisted of product quality and product innovation aspects. Our findings indicated that TQM practices were uniformly applied across the two countries. TQM were also found to have a significant impact on product quality and product innovation. However, the hypothesised mediating role of hard TQM was dismissed.

Suggested Citation

  • Soon W. Hong & Cheng-Li Huang, 2011. "Total Quality Management implementation in Research and Development organisations: a comparative study of South Korea and Taiwan," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 365-389.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:365-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38978
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:365-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.