IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v1y2007i3p313-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated approach to analyse system behaviour using knowledge-based approximate reasoning methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Rajiv Kumar Sharma
  • Dinesh Kumar
  • Pradeep Kumar

Abstract

Recent advances in technology and the growing complexity of systems have made the job of system-reliability engineers more challenging, because they have to analyse the uncertain behaviour of systems with the help of various analytical techniques that require the knowledge of precise numerical probabilities and component functional dependencies; the information for which is rather difficult to obtain. To cope with such situations, this paper presents the application of knowledge-based approximate reasoning methodologies, that is, fuzzy and grey approaches, as one of the most viable and effective tools for behaviour analysis of systems. An illustrative case from the paper industry is presented. Various parameters of importance to managerial decision-making, such as repair time, failure rate, mean time between failures, availability and expected number of failures related to system performance, are computed to quantify the behaviour in objective terms. Further, a risk-ranking approach-based on fuzzy and grey relational analysis is discussed to prioritise various failure causes associated with the components. Compared with the traditional Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), the proposed fuzzy and grey approach provides more pragmatic results.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajiv Kumar Sharma & Dinesh Kumar & Pradeep Kumar, 2007. "An integrated approach to analyse system behaviour using knowledge-based approximate reasoning methodologies," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 313-338.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:313-338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=14967
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:1:y:2007:i:3:p:313-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.