IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v17y2023i3-4p297-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of intercultural differences on the safety performance of Chinese international hydropower projects

Author

Listed:
  • Bouba Oumarou Aboubakar

Abstract

This study attempted to assess the influence of religion and beliefs, communication, demography and habits on safety motivation, behaviours and safety outcomes of workers. To achieve this, a structural equation model was designed in LISREL 8.8. After a consistency study on 566 workers' responses, the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. The results revealed, with 99% level of confidence, that cultural differences have a positive and significant impact on safety performance of workers. The structural model's findings also show that all cultural variables, including demographics, religion and belief, communication and cultural habits, have a significant impact on safety behaviour and motivation. One sub-hypothesis out of the 12 that were stated was rejected. The study disproved that safety outcomes are positively influenced by religious and philosophical convictions. According to the results, cultural differences do not positively affect the number of severe conflicts on Chinese-led hydropower projects in Cameroon.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouba Oumarou Aboubakar, 2023. "The influence of intercultural differences on the safety performance of Chinese international hydropower projects," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3/4), pages 297-319.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:17:y:2023:i:3/4:p:297-319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:17:y:2023:i:3/4:p:297-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.