IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v7y2011i4-5-6p320-339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics, public policies, professionals, power and performance – the 5Ps of 'modernisation' initiatives of the Labour Government in UK

Author

Listed:
  • C.V. Som

Abstract

This paper presents a critic of the 'modernisation' policies of the previous Labour Government with particular reference to National Health Service (NHS) and explores why the modernisation policies could not achieve its main objectives. How the present Coalition Government's policies intend to address the problems created by 'modernisation' is also analysed. Scrutiny reveals that 'modernisation' process is an interesting story of interplay of 5Ps: where public policies were skilfully used by 'spin doctors' to gain political dividends but failed to compel the professionals to give up their power in the name of performance management. In a sense the 'modernisation agenda' was used to convince people that the public policies are addressing their aspirations. There has been adverse effect on public sector organisations, particularly on public sector employees. If latest policy documents are any indications, then the Coalition Government's policies are equally confusing, perhaps taking Britain towards another 'winter of discontent'.

Suggested Citation

  • C.V. Som, 2011. "Politics, public policies, professionals, power and performance – the 5Ps of 'modernisation' initiatives of the Labour Government in UK," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4/5/6), pages 320-339.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:7:y:2011:i:4/5/6:p:320-339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43561
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:7:y:2011:i:4/5/6:p:320-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.