IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v17y2023i1-2p60-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of cutback management among US state governments: which cutback strategy should be used under certain context?

Author

Listed:
  • Sungchan Kim
  • Yinglee Tseng
  • Soyoung Park

Abstract

As fiscal crises have periodically arisen from the early 2000s, states can be expected to respond differently in terms of sustainment scenarios. However, few studies have systematically examined the choice of cutback strategies depending on the degree of organisational decline. Using a multinomial logit regression model, we strive to determine which factors result in the selection of certain cutback strategies. The results reveal that budgetary size is severely diminished, and that governments tend to make across-the-board cuts rather than employing specific strategies, including targeted cuts, which call for more comprehensive analysis. Additionally, the ideology of a governing party influences cutback decisions, and split governments tend to more commonly select across-the-board cuts. Unions also play an important role in choosing cutback strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungchan Kim & Yinglee Tseng & Soyoung Park, 2023. "Determinants of cutback management among US state governments: which cutback strategy should be used under certain context?," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1/2), pages 60-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:17:y:2023:i:1/2:p:60-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=133607
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:17:y:2023:i:1/2:p:60-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.